Legal Opinion
Mahoney v. Hoboken Rent Leveling Bd.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 28, 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
178 N.J. Super. 51 (1981)
427 A.2d 1138
WINIFRED MAHONEY AND MARY MELTZER, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
HOBOKEN RENT LEVELING BOARD, CARL KIRSHEN AND MARJORIE KIRSHEN, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Hudson County.
Decided January 28, 1981.
George B. Campen for plaintiffs (Farmer & Campen, attorneys).
Ross D. London for defendant Hoboken Rent Leveling Board (Lawrence E. Florio, Director and City Attorney, attorney).
Leonard J. Felzenberg for defendants Carl Kirshen and Marjorie Kirshen (Felzenberg & Siegel, attorneys; James L. Bosworth, of counsel).
BILDER, J.S.C.
This is an action in lieu of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Helmsley v. Borough of Fort LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- In Re Application of Howard Savings Institution of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Troy Hills Vil. v. Tp. Council Tp. Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cotati Alliance for Better Housing v. City of CotatiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Oceanside Mobilehome Park Owners' Ass'n v. City of OceansideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Parks v. Tenants Ass'n of Holly Hill Mobilehome TerraceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986