Legal Opinion
Baird v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided May 29, 1998No. CIV. 97-00721 ACKPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
KAY, Chief Judge.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
On December 28, 1988, defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm” or “defendant”) issued an automobile insurance policy to plaintiff Larry Baird (“plaintiff’) which provided for, amongst other things, Underinsured Motorist benefits (“UIM”) with a $35,000.00 limit. On April 28,1989, plaintiff was involved in an auto accident with Wade Gaal in which plaintiff sustained numerous injuries. On February 23, 1993, plaintiff recovered $35,000.00, the bodily injury policy limit, from Mr.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Saint Francis College v. Al-KhazrajiSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Government Employees Insurance v. DizolDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2001
- Field v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (In re Ho)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 2017
- Carter v. GEICO DIRECTDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2007