H. M. Kolbe Co., Inc. v. Armgus Textile Company, Inc., and Happy Cottons, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
For the reasons stated by Judge Murphy in his opinion below, D.C.S.D.N.Y., April 28, 1960, 184 F.Supp. 423, we conclude that plaintiff has made a prima facie showing both of the validity of its copyright and of infringement by the defendants, and hence is entitled to the injunction pending suit granted below. Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. v. Martin Weiner Corp., 2 Cir., 274 F.2d 487.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. And Henry Glass & Co. v. Martin Weiner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- HM Kolbe Co. v. Armgus Textile CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
3Cited by21 opinions
- Uneeda Doll Co., Inc. v. Goldfarb Novelty Co., Inc. And Walgreen Eastern Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Drop Dead Co. v. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Thomas Wilson & Company, Inc. v. Irving J. Dorfman Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- H. M. Kolbe Co., Inc. v. Armgus Textile Company, Inc. And Happy Cottons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Prestige Floral v. California Artificial Flower Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.