Nelson v. Bennett
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
Although I agree with my colleagues that the language suggesting that Ms. Frejlach may not use the home as a business is precatory, our opinions differ with regard to whether Ms. Frejlach is required to live in the devised home as a condition subsequent. After reviewing the language of Item 11(B)(6), I do not find a significant distinction between the language of desire that Ms. Frejlach not use the home as a business and the language desiring that Ms. Frejlach live on the premises. The majority opinion does not provide…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Braddy v. . ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Hall v. . QuinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Pugh v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Brinn v. . BrinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- City of Charlotte v. Charlotte Park & Recreation CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.