Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Nelson v. Bennett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 2010No. COA09-896Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

Although I agree with my colleagues that the language suggesting that Ms. Frejlach may not use the home as a business is precatory, our opinions differ with regard to whether Ms. Frejlach is required to live in the devised home as a condition subsequent. After reviewing the language of Item 11(B)(6), I do not find a significant distinction between the language of desire that Ms. Frejlach not use the home as a business and the language desiring that Ms. Frejlach live on the premises. The majority opinion does not provide…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Braddy v. . ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Hall v. . QuinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Pugh v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Brinn v. . BrinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. City of Charlotte v. Charlotte Park & Recreation CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API