Legal Opinion

Bianco v. Sciaulino

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided November 9, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph E. Capelia, J.

According to the predicate notice, the petitioner commenced this “owner use” holdover proceeding (9 NYCRR 2524.4 [a]) to recover possession of the respondent’s rent-stabilized apartment, as part of a broader effort to convert the nine apartments in the subject building into a single family home for his family. In a pre-answer motion to dismiss, the respondent tenant, Andrew C. Sciaulino, alleges that the proceeding is not ripe for adjudication (CPLR 3211 [a] [7]), because the petitioner will not be able to effectuate the plan enunciated in his notice…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Church of St. Paul & St. Andrew v. BarwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. MATTER OF 61 JANE ST. ASSOCS. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Pultz v. EconomakisNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Frank v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Maurice G.New York Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Rudd v. SharffCivil Court of the City of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API