Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

B.L. v. Schuhmann

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided October 27, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00151Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-151-RGJ-CHL B.L., et al., Plaintiffs, v. BRADLEY SCHUHMANN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents of Dickinson Wright, PLLC. (DN 499.) Defendant City of Louisville, Jefferson County/Louisville Consolidated Government (“Louisville Metro”) filed a response (DN 523), and Plaintiffs filed a reply (DN 536). The Court granted Louisville Metro leave to file a surreply. (DNs 561, 563.) The Court then directed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Hancock v. DodsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  3. Swidler & Berlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Sandra T.E. v. South Berwyn School District 100Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. In Re Antitrust Grand JuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API