State v. Hastings
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCallow, C.J.
This is an appeal from a criminal conviction in district court which was reversed on review by the Superior Court. The sole question is whether a defendant's consent is necessary before the defendant may be tried by a judge pro tempore in district court. We hold a criminal defendant has neither a constitutional nor a statutory right to insist that his or her consent be given to the authority of a pro tempore judge in district court.
Michael Hastings was charged with driving under the influence of intoxicants pursuant to RCW 46.61.502. Following a bench trial the defendant was found guilty by a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. EdwardsWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Young v. KonzWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- McKay v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- National Bank of Washington v. McCrillisWashington Supreme Court · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BelgardeWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Doe v. Fife Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Wings of World, Inc. v. Small Claims CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Banowsky v. BackstromWashington Supreme Court · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.