Legal Opinion

State v. Hastings

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1990No. 56964-9PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, C.J.

This is an appeal from a criminal conviction in district court which was reversed on review by the Superior Court. The sole question is whether a defendant's consent is necessary before the defendant may be tried by a judge pro tempore in district court. We hold a criminal defendant has neither a constitutional nor a statutory right to insist that his or her consent be given to the authority of a pro tempore judge in district court.

Michael Hastings was charged with driving under the influence of intoxicants pursuant to RCW 46.61.502. Following a bench trial the defendant was found guilty by a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. EdwardsWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Young v. KonzWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. McKay v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. National Bank of Washington v. McCrillisWashington Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BelgardeWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  3. Doe v. Fife Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. Wings of World, Inc. v. Small Claims CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. Banowsky v. BackstromWashington Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API