Legal Opinion

Moy Suey v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 11, 1906No. 1,239PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois.

1Opinion of the Court

GROSSCUP, Circuit Judge.

Moy Sucy, appellant, was arrested Eeb. 7th, 1904, as a Chinese person in the United States in violation of section 6 of the Act of May 5, 1892, c. 60, 27 Stat. 26 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1320], amended Nov. 3, 1893; the specific charge being that he was a Chinese laborer unlawfully in the United States, without a certificate of registration. At the final hearing before the Commissioner, Suey resisted an order of deportation, on the ground that he was a citizen of the United States, having been born in New York Citv twenty-two years previously. The Commissioner,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. The Japanese Immigrant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. United States v. Sing Tuck or King Do & Thirty-OneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. St. Louis Hay & Grain Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Colyer v. SkeffingtonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1920
  3. United States v. Hom LimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  4. Gee Cue Beng v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1911
  5. Jung See v. NashCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API