Legal Opinion
Brunswick v. Statewide Grievance Committee
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 4, 2007No. AC 27629Published
1Opinion of the Court
931 A.2d 319 (2007)
103 Conn.App. 601
Max F. BRUNSWICK
v.
STATEWIDE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE.
No. 27629.
Appellate Court of Connecticut.
Argued December 5, 2006.
Decided September 4, 2007.
Roger J. Frechette, New Haven, for the appellant (plaintiff).
Cathy A. Dowd, assistant bar counsel, for the appellee (defendant).
FLYNN, C.J., and McLACHLAN and Gruendel, Js.
GRUENDEL, J.
Rule 3.1 of the Rules of Professional Conduct requires in relevant part that attorneys in our state "shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis in law and fact for doing so that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited41 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.