Legal Opinion

Hensler v. B. & O. R. R.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1973No. CA-72-08-0059PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.

Plaintiff, the appellee herein, filed suit in the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County, as administrator of the estate of decedent Mary Elizabeth Hensler, for damages resulting from the collision of defendant-appellant’s train with an automobile in which decedent was a passenger. The complaint alleged that the collision was the direct and proximate result of defendant’s negligence in the operation of its train and in the maintenance of its tracks and right-of-way. The defendant’s answer admitted the collision, hut denied all other allegations of the complaint. In due course, a trial by jury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Rd. Co. v. RohrsOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Gedra v. Dallmer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Hocking Valley Ry. Co. v. WykleOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Strahm v. B. & O. R. R.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. King v. Branch Motor Express Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Case v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API