Legal Opinion

Naff v. Fairfield-American Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 16, 1936No. 6 Div. 826PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Complainant, Fairfield-American National Bank, as an existing creditor of defendant M. H. Naff, filed this bill against said defendant and his wife, Florence L. Naff, now residing "in the state of Florida, to set aside as in fraud of creditors the real estate therein described, situated in Jefferson county, Ala., and subject the same to the satisfaction of said indebtedness.

Whatever may be said concerning the original bill as to any personal judgment sought against the defendants, it is clear the bill as last amended seeks only the subjection of the realty to the payment of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gill v. MoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Robinson v. MoseleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Montgomery Enterprises v. Empire Theater Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Ex Parte CullinanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Ex Parte HaistenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pritchett v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Horton v. SpearsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Odem v. McCormackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API