Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Haisten

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 22, 1933No. 6 Div. 248PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petitioner filed his suit in the circuit court of Jefferson county, Ala., against the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, seeking to recover damages for an alleged assault and battery committed upon him by an agent, servant, or employee of said company, while he was on or near the railroad track of the defendant, in the town of Council Grove, in the state of Kansas.

Summons to answer the complaint in the case appears to have been served upon the defendant, the Missouri-Pacific Railroad Company, by leaving a copy of the same with "J. M. Due, agent of said company." This return was dated December…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Sweeney v. TritschSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Ex parte DoakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Ex Parte GaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Ex parte ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Atlas Auto Finance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Robinson Co. v. BeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Maner v. ManerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  4. Kolb v. Swann Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Vaughan v. VaughanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API