Legal Opinion

Dobbins v. Commonwealth Aluminum Corp.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 9, 1989No. 9261-5-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShields, J.

Max Dobbins' claim for industrial insurance was dismissed on summary judgment motion by Commonwealth Aluminum Corporation (Comalco). The trial court concluded he failed to establish a prima facie medical case of a work related disability. We reverse and remand for trial.

On January 24, 1985, Max Dobbins consulted an Oregon chiropractor, Dr. Georg-Karl Neller, because of pain in his right knee. He claimed he had injured it when he slipped and fell while dismounting a switch engine at work. Dr. Neller determined there was swelling, pain with weight bearing, a loss of motion, and substantial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Dennis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Stanley F. Taylor v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Sacred Heart Medical Center v. CarradoWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Miller v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Loushin v. ITT RayonierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  2. Dobbins v. Commonwealth Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API