United States ex rel. Benjamin v. Hendrick
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
This is a motion by the defendants for an order dismissing the action and complaint upon the stated grounds that (a) the plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and. (b) plaintiff is without legal capacity to sue.
*61The action, commonly known as an informer’s or “qui tarn” action, was instituted by the relator on May 24, 1943, under Sections 5438, 3490, 3491, 3492, 3493 and 3494 of the Revised Statutes, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 80, 82-86, 31 U.S.C.A. §§ 231-235, to recover double damages and forfeitures for the United States of America and on his own…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Central Mexico Light & Power Co. v. MunchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Boro Hall Corporation v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Beadleston v. SpragueNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- United States v. B. F. Goodrich Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
3Cited by2 opinions
- Raitt v. SeltzerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1950
- United States v. Anaconda Wire & Cable Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943