Legal Opinion

Al Haj v. United States

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided June 23, 2023No. 4:18-cv-00808Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION KHALED AL HAJ, § § Movant, § § V. § Civil Action No. 4:18-cv-808-O § (Criminal No. 4:16-cr-243-O (1)) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, § § Respondent. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant Khaled Al Haj (“Al Haj”) has filed a motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(2). Rule 60(b) Mot., ECF No. 36. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds the Rule 60(b) motion constitutes a successive § 2255 motion that must be dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. I.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. United States v. RichCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Carlos HernandesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  5. Tai Preyor v. Lorie Davis, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API