Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronald Rewald

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 16, 1988No. 87-1360PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Ronald Rewald filed a document entitled “Notice of Appeal” in his pending direct criminal appeal, No. 85-1353. When the notice was received, however, a new appeal was opened, No. 87-1360. The new appeal was then dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rewald now petitions for rehearing with a suggestion for rehearing en banc.

We construe the second notice of appeal as a motion for a limited remand to the district court to enable Rewald to challenge the sentence imposed, and order the “Notice of Appeal” filed in appeal No. 85-1353. 1 We dismiss appeal No. 87-1360 as opened in error.

In this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas Menhorn v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Donald Douglas BreierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. BrimmerTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  2. United States v. Raymond M. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Anthony Meyers, A/K/A Tony MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. John Lee Molinaro, United States of America v. Donald P. Mangano, Sr., United States of America v. Donald P. Mangano, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. William Richard MinorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API