Legal Opinion
Perlin v. Greenberg
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
Plaintiff moves to restrain the defendants from transferring or interfering in any way with the funds that are now or which may hereafter come into their possession with respect to a certain contract with the United States Army at Fort Totten, Long Island, and also for the appointment of a receiver of such funds.
The defendant Calvada, Inc., has a contract with the United States Army for certain construction work at Fort Totten, Long Island. That defendant engaged the defendant Harry Greenberg, doing business individually and under certain trade names, to do the plumbing and electrical work on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Pine Hill-Kingston Bus Corp. v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Babho Realty Co. v. FefferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Century Cement Manufacturing Co. v. FioreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Eastern Rock Products, Inc. v. NatansonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Caiazzo v. Hall Developers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957