Smith ex rel. Plummer v. Thompson
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingliam. (Person, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to a declaration in case.
The declaration alleges, in substance, that on the 27th of December, 1889, Smith owned 8,000 shares in the George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Company of Jackson, of the par value of $200,000, and which represented two-thirds of the entire capital, and that the defendants owned a majority of the stock of the Knickerbocker Conrpany; that the two companies were engaged in making and selling machines known as “purifiers,” “reels,” and “scalpers,” used in manufacturing flour, and were active competitors; ■ that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beebe v. KnappMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Final v. BackusMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Morton v. PrestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Brady v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Hutchinson v. WhitmoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jones v. HicksMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Cochran Timber Co. v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Borchert v. BorchertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Schmidt v. GauklerMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Perkett v. Manistee & Northeastern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.