Legal Opinion

Powell v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1934No. 9838PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKussell, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts). We shall deal first with the special grounds of the motion for new trial.

Error is assigned on the admission of testimony offered in *410support of the general character of the prosecutrix, Euby Moncrief, for chastity. The objection was stated as follows: “We object to that evidence and move to rule it out. We have not attacked her character. We insist there is only two ways that the character of a witness can be sustained. One is when the defendant has attacked the character of the witness for general bad character, and the other is when it is sought to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Manchester v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  4. Haden v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  5. Pelham & Havana Railroad v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Hyde v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Hart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  4. Leutner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API