Legal Opinion

People v. Hamilton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1906No. Docket No. 242PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Montcalm; Davis, J. Thomas Hamilton was convicted of violating the local option law.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

The respondent was convicted upon the 10th day of April, 1905, in the circuit court for Montcalm county, of violating the local option law alleged to be in force in that county. Respondent introduced no evidence in his defense, but contended, as he contends in this court, that the alleged local option law was invalid for the reason that the proceedings of the board of supervisors were not sufficient to authorize the submission of the proposed law to a vote of the electors of the county. The fatal omissions of the board relied upon for a reversal of the judgment below are:

First. That the board…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Giddings v. WellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hanna v. ChalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ehinger v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. People v. FischMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Rutledge v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Madill v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API