Legal Opinion
AMCO Insurance v. Inspired Technologies, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 19, 2010No. Civil 08-5748 (JRT/FLN)Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge.
Plaintiff AMCO Insurance Company (“AMCO”), filed a complaint against defendant Inspired Technologies, Inc. (“ITI”), seeking a declaration from this Court that AMCO does not have a duty to defend or indemnify ITI in ITI’s litigation with 3M Company (“3M”). The case is now before the Court on AMCO’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants AMCO’s motion.
BACKGROUND
AMCO issued ITI a comprehensive general liability insurance policy (the “Policy”), which…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Bahr v. Boise Cascade Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Metric & Multistandard Components Corporation v. Metric's, Inc., Metric & Multistandard Components Corporation v. Metric's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.