Legal Opinion

Seay v. Plunkett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 1, 1914No. 3888PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Error from District Court, Kingfisher County; 'Action by Matthew Plunkett against A. J. Seay and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HARRISON, C.

This action was begun by Matthew Plunkett against A. J. Seay and Mrs. M. C. Baker for damages resulting from personal injuries sustained from falling through the areaway from the third floor to the second floor of a hotel owned by defendant Seay and operated by defendant Mrs. Baker. Plunkett, the plaintiff below, was a guest at said hotel, who, with some other guests, had arrived at the hotel late in the night. There was no one up about the hotel at the time except the night clerk. The other guests who arrived with him were shown to a room, after which the clerk, being…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Holmes v. ClisbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Alabama Great Southern R. R. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. RadfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BrazzellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Clancy v. BarkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. CauthenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Minnetonka Oil Co. v. HavilandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. of St. Paul v. RobisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Mayo Hotel Co. v. DancigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API