Legal Opinion

State v. Finehout

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1983No. 5372PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

Defendant, David Allen Finehout, was convicted of robbery, A.R.S. § 13-1902(A), burglary, A.R.S. § 13-1507(A), and first-degree murder, A.R.S. § 13-1105(A)(2), and sentenced to life imprisonment without possibility of parole for twenty five years, A.R.S. § 13-703. We have jurisdiction to review his conviction and sentence under Ariz. Const, art. 6 § 5(3), and A.R.S. §§ 13-4031, 13^035.

The issue we must resolve on appeal is whether the trial court erred in refusing to suppress the defendant’s confessions before conducting a trial by submission.

The facts needed to resolve the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. LaGrandArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. StanleyArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. CarterArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. MauroArizona Supreme Court · 1988

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API