Legal Opinion

Clare Immaculata Kenny, in 77-2489 v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, in No. 77-2490, and City of Philadelphia

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 18, 1978No. 77-2489, 77-2490PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

Whether a woman who is raped in the station of the Philadelphia transit system may recover damages from the carrier because of its lack of adequate protection is the issue in this diversity case. We conclude that a showing of deficient lighting on the station platform and insufficient attention to conditions by the only employee on the premises support a jury finding of carrier culpability. Accordingly, we reverse judgment n. o. v. in favor of the' transit authority and reinstate the jury verdict.

The young woman plaintiff was awaiting the arrival of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ford v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Anderson v. Bushong Pontiac Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Moran v. Valley Forge Drive-In Theater, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Morgan v. Bucks AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Atamian v. Supermarkets General Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Roger Turbe v. Government of the Virgin Islands, Virgin Islands Water and Power AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. Transgo, Inc. v. Ajac Transmission Parts Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Transgo, Inc. v. Ajac Transmission Parts Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Foster v. Winston-Salem Joint VentureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. D.L. Ex Rel. Friederichs v. HuebnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API