Legal Opinion

Thorne v. Farrar

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1910No. 8484PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered January 8, 1909, dismissing, on the merits, an action in equity.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

Tins is a suit in equity brought for the purpose of annulling a marriage on the alleged ground of duress. At *442the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, a judgment of dismissal was entered on the insufficiency of the evidence. The plaintiff has appealed.

The duress alleged in the complaint is that an attorney and a police officer, at the instance of the respondent, for the purpose of coercing and intimidating the appellant to enter into a marriage contract with the respondent, made threats to the appellant, “that they would continue and complete a certain criminal action then pending, wherein the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson, ex rel. Dies v. WinneNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  2. Franke v. FrankeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Marvin v. MarvinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
  4. Meredith v. MeredithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Young v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. Ingebrigt v. Seattle Taxicab & Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Shepherd v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Bertschinger v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Kelley v. KelleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API