Legal Opinion

Zucht v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 19, 1919No. 6276Published

Error from Bexar County Court; John H. Clark, Judge. Action by Roberta Brooks and husband against A. D. Zucht and others, dismissed as to all except defendant Zucht Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Zucht brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

IT/T, C. J.

This suit was originally instituted by defendants in error, Roberta Brooks and Ed. Brooks, her husband, hereinafter called appellees to prevent confusion, against Cole Y. Bailey, Clemmie Bailey, Carson Colley, and A. D. Zucht, plaintiff in error, and hereinafter called appellant, to recover damages alleged to have arisen from personal injuries inflicted on the said Roberta Brooks through a collision of automobiles caused through the negligence of the defendants. The cause of action was dismissed as to all the defendants except A. D. Zucht, who, it was alleged, negligently ran into…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. VollrathCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. Ray v. Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. Cherryhomes v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API