Legal Opinion

Minjak Co. v. Randolph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 24, 1988PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In July of 1983 petitioner landlord commenced the within summary nonpayment proceeding against respondents Randolph and Kikuchi, tenants of a loft space on the fourth floor of petitioner’s building on West 20th Street in Manhattan, alleging nonpayment of rent since July 1981. The tenants’ answer set forth as affirmative defenses that because they were unable to use two thirds of the loft space due to the landlord’s renovations and other conditions, they were entitled to an abatement of two thirds of the rent, and that as to the remaining one-third space, they were entitled to a further rent…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Barash v. PA. TERM. REAL ESTATE CORP.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Edgerton v. . PageNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Halpin v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Williamson, Picket, Gross, Inc. v. HirschfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. German v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. Richard Barton Enterprises, Inc. v. TsernUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Doe v. RoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Morris v. FlaigDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  5. Parke-Hayden, Inc. v. Loews Theatre Management Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API