Legal Opinion

Cipala v. LINCOLN TECH. INSTITUTE

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 26, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

806 A.2d 820 (2002)

354 N.J. Super. 247

Andrea E. CIPALA, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Respondent,

v.

LINCOLN TECHNICAL INSTITUTE,[1] Defendant-Respondent/Cross-Appellant,

The Cittone Institute and Stonington Partners,[2] Defendants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 10, 2002.

Decided September 26, 2002.

Mandy R. Steele, East Brunswick, argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent.

Steven Backfisch, Westfield, argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant (Lindabury, McCormick & Estabrook, attorneys; Mr. Backfisch and Anne B. Gasior, on the brief).

Before Judges STERN,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Donovan v. BachstadtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Do-Wop Corp. v. City of RahwaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  4. Stopford v. Boonton Molding Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  5. Minnesota Amusement Company, a Corporation v. John Fred LarkinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cipala v. Lincoln Technical InstituteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. Kunal Sethi v. Mohammed Jaffar Ismail and Lubna IsmailDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API