Legal Opinion
Tripp v. Astrue
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 24, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2008-1861PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this case under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) against Michael Astrue, the Commissioner of Social Security, seeking review of the Social Security Administration’s (“SSA”) denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Plaintiff applied for benefits after suffering an injury to his right hand “due to an accident at my former residence.” (Compl. at 1.) Defendant moved to dismiss the case or for judgment on the pleadings, asserting that this case was untimely because…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Butler, Joan S. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Valere Poulin v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Davis v. HecklerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carnett v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Campfield v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Max v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Mitchell v. SaulDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021