Legal Opinion

Shay v. American Iron & Steel Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1907No. Appeal, No. 111PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 111, Jan. T., 1906, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Lebanon Co., Dec. T., 1902, No. 139, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Sallie E. Shay v. American Iron & Steel Manufacturing Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries and for injuries to a house.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 111, Jan. T., 1906, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Lebanon Co., Dec. T., 1902, No. 139, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Sallie E. Shay v. American Iron & Steel Manufacturing Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries and for injuries to a house. Before Ehrgood, P. J. At the trial the court entered a compulsory nonsuit which it subsequently refused to take off, Ehrgood, P. J., filing the following opinion: The plaintiff is the owner of a house and a lot of ground, situated on Weidman street, in the city of Lebanon, and alleges that on September 20, 1902,…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the court below refusing to take off the nonsuit.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Greb v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Walker v. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on LivesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Heinrich Chemical Co. v. IngramSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Kayser v. Pennsylvania Railroad, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API