Eads v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
..Appeal from Russell.Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
OpinioN op the Court by
Judge Nunn
Affirming.
In October, 1913, the appellant was indicted and charged with the offense of forcibly ravishing and having carnal knowledge of a certain female on the - day of January, 1913, against her will and consent. For a decision of this case it is unnecessary to name the prosecuting witness, or to relate or discuss the incriminating facts disclosed in the evidence.
The appellant was convicted and sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of 10 to 20 years. Judgment was pronounced under' the Indeterminate Sentence Law then in force, and found in the Acts of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Nider v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Fenston v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1885
3Cited by9 opinions
- Meade v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Merriss v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- State v. WingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Blankenship v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Frierson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.