State v. McRae
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
In the course of a sentencing hearing in a case heard prior to defendants’, the district attorney, referring to the defendant in that case, stated that “when a defendant refuses to testify, he may have a criminal record to hide.” These remarks were made in the presence of the venire which was to try defendants’ case. When their case was called, defendants moved for a continuance on the grounds that the district attorney’s remarks were prejudicial. The court conducted a voir dire, determined that the district attorney would not be in charge of trying the present case, and denied…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. McKissickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. CurrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008