Legal Opinion

State v. McRae

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1977No. 7616SC617PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

In the course of a sentencing hearing in a case heard prior to defendants’, the district attorney, referring to the defendant in that case, stated that “when a defendant refuses to testify, he may have a criminal record to hide.” These remarks were made in the presence of the venire which was to try defendants’ case. When their case was called, defendants moved for a continuance on the grounds that the district attorney’s remarks were prejudicial. The court conducted a voir dire, determined that the district attorney would not be in charge of trying the present case, and denied…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. McKissickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. CurrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API