Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Park Sav. Bank

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 29, 1935No. Nos. 6328, 6391PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

This case was brought in the lower court by the appellants to recover judgment against the directors of the insol*956vent Park Savings Bank of Washington, D. C., in behalf of the bank’s depositors and other creditors.

The amended bill of complaint filed in the lower court by appellant Thompson and the cross-bill filed therein by appellant Moran, as receiver, were in part dismissed by the court for want of substance. The present appeal was taken from this order of dismissal.

Inasmuch as the ruling of the lower court was 'based solely upon the allegations of the amended bill of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Tulare Irrigation District v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Thompson v. Saint Nicholas National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Commissioners of Douglas County v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Lantry v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. McBroom v. Scottish Mortgage & Land Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Park Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Moran v. SchlosbergDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1937
  3. Parsons v. BarryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1944
  4. Gossett v. GreenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API