Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kubis v. Community Memorial Hospital Ass'n

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 28, 2017No. A16-0361Published

1DissentLillehaug, Justice

The opinion of the court does not give the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals the long-established deference accorded by our case law. If that deference were given, the employee would be entitled to workers’ compensation benefits based on our precedent directly on point, Kirchner v. County of Anoka, 339 N.W.2d 908 (Minn. 1983). Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

I

The story of Kristel Kubis’s workplace injury is not complicated. Nurse Kubis was nearing the end of her shift on the second floor of the hospital. While “in report”— telling the .incoming nurses about developments that occurred…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Barlau v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Dykhoff v. Xcel EnergySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. Kirchner v. County of AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Miller v. Goodhue-Rice-Wabasha Citizens Action Council, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API