Legal Opinion

Andino v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 5, 1983No. 3-82-070-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POWERS, Justice.

The jury, against appellant’s plea of not guilty, found him guilty of the aggravated robbery of Lawrence Richardson, imposing punishment of seventy years imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. Appellant challenges his conviction on two grounds of error, both of which are directed at the action of the trial court in admitting into evidence, over appellant’s objection and his pre-trial motion to suppress, certain incriminating statements which appellant had made to a grand jury. We will affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The record reveals that appellant was confined in the Bell…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. State v. DictadoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Cerda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  4. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. Port v. HeardDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API