Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Chopak

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 18, 1947No. 180, Docket 20481Published

1DissentClark, Circuit Judge

This case has given me much concern. Emphatically and eloquently the Supreme Court has safeguarded the right, even the duty, of free general and public criticism of the courts against repression by fines for contempt. Pennekamp v. Florida, 328 U. S. 331, 66 S.Ct. 1028; Bridges v. State of California, 314 U.S. 252, 62 S.Ct. 190, 86 L.Ed. 192, 159 A.L.R. 1346. This case really presents the same issue, albeit without the same publicity (since the criticism was made privately to the judge himself), but with greater severity of punishment (since appellant lost his professional standing for three…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bridges v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Pennekamp v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Donnelly Garment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. In re ChopakDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API