Legal Opinion
Babbitt v. Read
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 3, 1909PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, Circuit Judge.
The defendants object that the bill is defective, because the Central Trust Company, a corporation of the state of New York, has not been made a party, and the cause is set down on that objection only under equity rule 52.
The complainant, a citizen of Missouri, is the trustee in bankruptcy of the Randolph-Macon Coal Company, a corporation of the same-state, where it has been duly adjudicated a bankrupt. The bill charges that a mortgage on the company’s property to secure an issue of $3,~ 000,000 of bonds, of which $2,150,000 are outstanding, has been foreclosed, resulting…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Sawyer v. HoagSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- In re Remington Automobile & Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- In re Munger Vehicle Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kiskadden v. SteinleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- In re Newfoundland SyndicateDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1912
- Babbitt v. ReadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1914
- Burningham v. BurkeUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- Barnitt v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.