Legal Opinion
Philm Corp. v. Washington Township
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 16, 1994No. 976 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
Before us is an appeal by Philm Corporation (Philm) from a judgment entered in favor of Washington Township, Stanley J. Margie, III, and Stanley M. Lysek (Appellees) and Jill C. Corley and Charles R. Rissmiller (Intervenors). In this- declaratory judgment action, The Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County ruled that Philm must make application for a variance to the Washington Township Zoning Hearing Board in order to continue operating its establishment known as The Fox in its present location in Washington Township.
It is undisputed that prior to Philm opening The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hanna v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Township of Chartiers v. William H. Martin, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Limley v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Mignatti AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Gustin v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Southco, Inc. v. Concord TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Atherton Development Co. v. Township of FergusonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- 1916 Delaware Tavern, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Foreman v. Union Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Colony National Ins. v. Hing Wah Chinese RestaurantDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.