Securities and Exchange Commission v. Vidul Prakash
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No. 23-cv-03300-BLF COMMISSION, 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S 9 MOTION FOR SUMMARY v. JUDGMENT AND GRANTING 10 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL VIDUL PRAKASH, SUMMARY JUDGMENT 11 Defendant. [Re: ECF Nos. 199, 201] 12 13 Before the Court are Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC’s”) Motion 14 for Partial Summary Judgment, ECF No. 199 (“Pl. Mot.”), and Defendant Vidul Prakash’s Motion 15 for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 201 (“Def. Mot.”). Plaintiff filed…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Metzler Investment GMBH v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.