Legal Opinion
New York Telephone Co. v. Schumacher & Forelle, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 20, 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Capozzoli, J.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. This proceeding arises out of construction work performed for petitioner, New York Telephone Co. (NYT) at a building located at 4101 14th Avenue, Brooklyn, N. Y. Respondent, Schumacher & Forelle, Inc., (S & F) was the general contractor on that project. *152Lorson Electric Contractors Corp. (Lorson) was an electrical subcontractor on the project.
The written agreement between S & F and NYT dated December 2, 1971 incorporated by reference a series of documents including "General Conditions of the Contract”.
In 1975 Lorson sued…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Arbitration between Exercycle Corp. & MarattaNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Pearl Street Development Corp. v. Conduit & Foundation Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Board of Education of the Schenevus Central School District & Merritt Meridian Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Shook of West Virginia, Inc. v. York City Sewer AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Mario & Di Bono Plastering Co. v. Rivergate Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re Arbitration between County of Rockland & Primiano Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- In re the Arbitration between Liebhafsky & Comstruct Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984