Legal Opinion · Dissent
In re the Arbitration between Liebhafsky & Comstruct Associates, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 5, 1984Published
1Dissent
Fein and Kassal, JJ.,
dissent in a memorandum by Kassal, J., as follows: Petitioners, owners of a townhouse located at 186 Sullivan Street, New York, New York, had engaged respondent as a general contractor to perform extensive alterations to the premises. The written contract, entered into July 31, 1981, provided for progress payments to respondent in the total sum of $221,600, with the work to be completed by November 15,1981.11 According to petitioners, the progress of the job fell significantly behind schedule and, in addition, respondent’s work was found to be deficient. Petitioners…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between the County of Rockland & Primiano Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Nationwide General Insurance v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Pearl Street Development Corp. v. Conduit & Foundation Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Johnson v. Travelers Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.