Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Cardinal

Delaware Family Court

Decided January 11, 1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

MILLMAN, Judge.

This case is a paternity action filed by Michael Cardinal and Catherine Cardinal as guardians ad litem for their minor son, Scott Michael Cardinal (“Scott”), against Tanya Ellen Perch ("Tanya”). See, 13 Del.C. § 801 et seq. (“Delaware Paternity Act”).

After blood grouping tests indicated a 99.99 percent probability that Scott was the father of Shawn Allen Perch (“Shawn”), an acknowledgment of paternity was executed. Subsequent to the acknowledgment of paternity, Scott filed a motion for a change of name. See, 13 Del.C. § 819. The issue before this Court is whether Shawn’s name,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of SchiffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bobo v. JewellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Ribeiro v. MonahanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API