Legal Opinion
Williams v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 12, 1992No. C14-90-00540-CRPublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEARS, Justice.
Charles Williams appeals from a conviction for delivery of a controlled substance, namely cocaine. Appellant pled not guilty to the charge and the case was tried before a jury. Upon a finding of guilty, and true to two enhancement paragraphs, punishment was assessed at seventy-five years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division. We affirm.
On March 10, 1989, Officers Carl Chaney and Norman Frileaux of the Houston Police Department entered into a transaction to purchase a controlled substance. The police went to a particular location…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Bowden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Whiting v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Marroquin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Ex Parte NailorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Fairow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Thieu Quang Bui v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
- Roberson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2003
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.