Legal Opinion

Oregel v. PacPizza CA1/2

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 2015No. A141947UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHMAN, J. —

Seventeen months and more than 1,300 attorney hours after plaintiff Julio Oregel (Oregel) filed a class action against his former employer, defendant PacPizza, LLC (PacPizza), PacPizza petitioned to compel arbitration of Oregel’s claims. The trial court denied the petition, finding PacPizza waived its right to enforce a purported arbitration agreement between the two parties. PacPizza appeals, primarily contending the court erred in denying the petition, and also asserting two other claimed errors. We conclude the petition was properly denied, a conclusion that moots…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Gentry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sprunk v. Prisma LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Aronow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  3. Aronow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  4. Hofer v. BoladianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. McGuire v. 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API