Legal Opinion

Bowlen v. Wertz

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County

Decided June 1, 2010No. 10894 of 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

COX, J.,

Before the court for disposition is the motion for judgment on the pleadings filed on behalf of the plaintiff Brett G. Bowlen, which argues that the defendant Cindy Wertz is required to return her engagement ring to the plaintiff because they are no longer engaged and they failed to marry.

The following facts have been established thus far through the pleadings: The plaintiff, who now resides at 173 Capital Drive, Weirton, West Virginia, entered into an exclusive relationship with the defendant, who now *313resides at 222 South Market Street No. 2, New Wilmington, Lawrence County,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. NelsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Hammerstein v. LindsaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Lindh v. SurmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Kerr v. Borough of Union CityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Kelly v. Hazleton General HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API