Lindh v. Surman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NEWMAN, Justice.
In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether a donee of an engagement ring must return the ring or its equivalent value when the donor breaks the engagement.
*3The facts of this case depict a tumultuous engagement between Rodger Lindh (Rodger), a divorced, middle-aged man, and Janis Surman (Janis), the object of Rodger’s inconstant affections. In August of 1993, Rodger proposed marriage to Janis. To that purpose, he presented her with a diamond engagement ring that he purchased for $17,400. Rodger testified that the price was less than the ring’s market value because he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pavlicic v. VogtsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Heiman v. ParrishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- Ruehling v. HornungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Semenza v. AlfanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
3Cited by14 opinions
- Porreco v. PorrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Albinger v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Nicholson v. JohnstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Campbell v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- In re Foundation for Anglican Christian TraditionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.