Legal Opinion

Lindh v. Surman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 1999No. 0039 W.D. Appeal Docket 1998PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NEWMAN, Justice.

In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether a donee of an engagement ring must return the ring or its equivalent value when the donor breaks the engagement.

*3The facts of this case depict a tumultuous engagement between Rodger Lindh (Rodger), a divorced, middle-aged man, and Janis Surman (Janis), the object of Rodger’s inconstant affections. In August of 1993, Rodger proposed marriage to Janis. To that purpose, he presented her with a diamond engagement ring that he purchased for $17,400. Rodger testified that the price was less than the ring’s market value because he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pavlicic v. VogtsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Heiman v. ParrishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. Ruehling v. HornungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Semenza v. AlfanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Porreco v. PorrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Albinger v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Nicholson v. JohnstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Campbell v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  5. In re Foundation for Anglican Christian TraditionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API