Legal Opinion
Kent v. Apfel
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided October 12, 1999No. 98-4022-SACPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, Senior District Judge.
This is an action to review the final decision of the defendant Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying the claimant Bryan K. Kent’s applications for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”) and for supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Act. The case is ripe for decision on the parties’ briefs filed pursuant to D.Kan. Rule 83.7.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The claimant applied for disability benefits under Title II on March 1, 1993, asserting he had been disabled as of February…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bolan v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Windus v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
- Buck v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002