Legal Opinion

Scenic Arizona v. City of Phoenix Board of Adjustment

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 9, 2012No. 1 CA-CV 09-0489PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROWN, Judge.

¶ 1 The City of Phoenix Board of Adjustment (“Board”) granted a use permit to American Outdoor Advertising, Inc. (“American Outdoor”) to operate an electronic billboard adjacent to Interstate 17. 1 The Neighborhood Coalition of Greater Phoenix, along with Scenic Arizona, 2 petitioned for special action in the superior court, asserting the billboard would violate Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 28-7903 (1998), 3 a provision of the Arizona Highway Beautification Act (“AHBA”). The court determined that Scenic had standing to challenge the Board’s decision, but…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pawn 1st, LLC v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  2. Callowhill Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of Philadelphia Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. McKesson Corp. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Baumgartner v. TimminsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. David Welch v. Cochise Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API