Legal Opinion

Helvering v. Union Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 3, 1934No. 51PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Prior to 1913 respondent, directly or through a subsidiary corporation, sold three issues of bonds, all maturing at dates subsequent to 1923. All were sold at a discount and petitioner paid or allowed to bankers an additional amount as commissions for marketing the bonds. The commissions and discounts, amortized over the periods from the dates of issue to maturity of the bonds, exceeded $300,000 in each of its taxable years 1918 to 1923 inclusive. Respondent kept its books and made its tax returns on the accrual basis. Deduction from gross income, in its tax returns, of the amortized amount…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Old Colony Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Niles Bement Pond Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Aluminum Castings Co. v. RoutzahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Helvering v. WinmillSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Spreckels v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. United States v. Midland-Ross Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API