Legal Opinion
Bruland v. Howerton
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided July 3, 1990No. 84-0240-CivPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINAL ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES
NESBITT, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a)-(b) and 2412(d) (“Equal Access to Justice Act”). After due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees is GRANTED in PART.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The facts underlying this case are described in detail in this Court’s Order of March 27, 1985 and in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in the consolidated appeals of Lyden v. Howerton and Bruland v. Howerton, 783…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. ShayganDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Harriott v. AshcroftDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Taylor Group, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
- United States v. Eighty-Eight (88) Designated Accounts Containing Monies Traceable to Exchanges for Controlled SubstancesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1992